Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!xanth!mcnc!ece-csc!ncrcae!ncrlnk!ncrwic!encad!entec!jlohmeye From: jlohmeye@entec.Wichita.NCR.COM (John Lohmeyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: QIC ANSI standards (was Re: QIC-02 vs. QIC-36) Message-ID: <312@entec.Wichita.NCR.COM> Date: 8 Jan 89 04:00:46 GMT References: <174@wa3wbu.UUCP> <833@ritcsh.UUCP> Reply-To: jlohmeye@entec.UUCP (John Lohmeyer) Organization: NCR Corporation, Wichita, Kansas Lines: 31 In article <833@ritcsh.UUCP> sic@ritcsh.UUCP (Eric A. Neulight) writes: ... stuff deleted ... > It follows the ANSI standards: > QIC-36 QIC-02 QIC-24 and one other I cant remember. ... stuff deleted ... > , but >all of these interfaces are ANSI standards, and are freely available >to the public as such. I tracked down the bureau that distributes >all the QIC info and had them send me all the descriptions and other >pertinents. I am not near my desk right now so I can't supply the >phone number, but call ANSI in New York City and find out the number >of the place in California that distributes the QIC proposals. > The QIC "standards" are NOT ANSI standards. There is a considerable difference in the process used to create ANSI standards from the process used to create QIC standards. (ANSI standards must follow a process that guarantees there is a consensus on the standard and that all meaningful points of view have been addressed. QIC standards are developed by a group of manufacturers who pay significant sums of money to participate.) ANSI does know the QIC phone number, because they get many mis-directed phone calls. Perhaps I can save you a little time: The QIC standards were developed by an organization known as Freeman Associates (Ray Freeman) and I believe it is located in Santa Barbara, CA. BTW, there is an ANSI standard based on QIC-02 that was recently published. I believe it is called something like "Streaming Cartridge Tape Devices" and it should be an X3 standard with a number greater than X3.140. John Lohmeyer jlohmeyer@entec.Wichita.NCR.COM