Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!iuvax!pur-ee!pc.ecn.purdue.edu!jmoore From: jmoore@pc.ecn.purdue.edu (James D Moore) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Turbo C 2.0 and EMS Message-ID: <1161@pc.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: 12 Jan 89 20:09:42 GMT References: <1624@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> <4330113@hpindda.HP.COM> <29154@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <8204@dasys1.UUCP> <31050@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Reply-To: jmoore@pc.ecn.purdue.edu.UUCP (James D Moore) Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network Lines: 20 In article <31050@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Christopher Schanck writes: >My beef with TC is a pretty bogus one, but it is a beef nonetheless. How come >you can by a version completely functional only integrated (no debugger=not >functional) for cheap; or a version with both complete systems for more; but >you can't by a version that is just command line, with a debugger, for cheap. >I wouldn't mind not having the IE, but I would really like the debugger for >the command-line!!! Oh well, I am probably in a minority here... > What do you consider cheap? The fact that you work (or are a student) for a University you can get the TC2.0 and TD1.0 software for less than it cost me to upgrade and get the debugger. Call Borland and talk to their educational sales. I beleive that the cost for TC 2.0 was $59.95 and for the TD 1.0 was also $59.95. It cost me $149 to upgrade and get my copy of the TD debugger. I did not go through the University since my copy was for personal use. The TD debugger is real nice. It is well worth the money. Jim Moore jmoore@cimlab.ecn.purdue.edu