Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!b-tech!m-net!mju
From: mju@m-net.UUCP (Marc Unangst)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Request for poll of ten best/worst
Message-ID: <2723@m2-net.UUCP>
Date: 15 Jan 89 17:47:18 GMT
References: <210@imspw6.UUCP> <216100074@trsvax> <1284@skinner.nprdc.arpa>
Reply-To: mju@m-net.UUCP (Marc Unangst)
Organization: M-NET, Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 20

In article <1284@skinner.nprdc.arpa> malloy@nprdc.arpa (Sean Malloy) writes:
>I got a copy of Telix to look over -- and wiped it off my disk fifteen
>minutes later as being worthless. Why? My modem is on COM4. Telix, in
>its infinite wisdom, requires the modem to be either COM1 or COM2. I
>agree that Telix is an incredible piece of software . . . but not in
>the sense that you mean. Certainly it's not worth calling one of the
>"best" products of the year.

(I would have sent this in mail, but I feel that it is important enough
to post.)

What version of Telix did you try?  Earlier versions of Telix may have
only supported COM1 and COM2, but v3.11 supports COM1-8, and also
supports modifying the starting address and IRQ line.

-- 
Marc Unangst
UUCP: mju@m-net.ann-arbor.mi.us
UUCP path: ...!uunet!mailrus!clip!m-net!mju
Internet: mju%m-net@cardiology.ummc.umich.edu