Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!harmonica.cis.ohio-state.edu!schanck
From: schanck@harmonica.cis.ohio-state.edu (Christopher Schanck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Experience with Ctree database
Keywords: database
Message-ID: <32073@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 20 Jan 89 03:18:43 GMT
References: <2784@stiatl.UUCP>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: Christopher Schanck <schanck@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: Ohio State University Computer and Information Science
Lines: 13

In article <2784@stiatl.UUCP> meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) writes:
>I can strongly recommend C-Tree (FairComm). I worked on a project where

I can strongly un-recommend Btrieve; expensive, no source, unheard of
liscensing (as I recall), unbeleivably bad docs, etc. It is quick
(real quick!!!!) and has multi-user and lan versions. But it is a
bitch to program (we used it with TC 1.0 & 1.5).

Chris
-=-
"My brain is NOT a deadlock-free environment!!!!"
--- Christopher Schanck, mammal at large.
schanck@flounder.cis.ohio-state.edu