Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!sm.unisys.com!csun!polyslo!dorourke
From: dorourke@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (David M. O'Rourke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: MPW vs Lightspeed
Message-ID: <7117@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>
Date: 18 Jan 89 08:17:27 GMT
References: <322@s1.sys.uea.ac.uk>
Reply-To: dorourke@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (David M. O'Rourke)
Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo
Lines: 17

In article <322@s1.sys.uea.ac.uk> jrk@s1.UUCP (Richard Kennaway) writes:
>2.  I *like* Lightspeed's automatic make feature, as opposed to composing
>makefiles by hand in MPW,

  Note:  I'm not trying to start a war between the two enviroments, both have
         +'s and -'s, you decide which enviroment has more -'s

  How come you've been doing Makefiles by hand.  I've found MPW's build
facility to be very good for the most part, and once it's set up the
generalized form of the make file it's very easy to edit and modify to suit
my needs, sort of like what you do with ResEdit and derez.

-- 
David M. O'Rourke                                  dorourke@polyslo.calpoly.edu

"If it doesn't do Windows, then it's not a computer!!!"
Disclaimer: I don't represent the school.  All opinions are mine!