Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!gec-rl-hrc.co.uk!nigel
From: nigel@gec-rl-hrc.co.uk (Nigel Mitchell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Subject: MemWait or notMemWait
Message-ID: <8901201617.aa20701@welly.gec-rl-hrc.co.uk>
Date: 20 Jan 89 16:17:13 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 5

In response to the question about MemWait.
Either I have missed the point completely or we are talking about
MemWait (and not notMemWait), ie it is active high. Some care must be
taken about just when to assert/negate it but passing it through a
D-typed clocked by ProcClockOut seems a pretty good idea.