Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:11212 comp.unix.aux:610
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!maxim!prc
From: prc@maxim.ERBE.SE (Robert Claeson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.aux
Subject: Re: terminfo vs. termcap
Keywords: Why do we need two different terminal capability widgets?
Message-ID: <461@maxim.ERBE.SE>
Date: 19 Jan 89 08:46:11 GMT
References: <6966@june.cs.washington.edu>
Organization: ERBE DATA AB
Lines: 28

In article <6966@june.cs.washington.edu>, mckenzie@june.cs.washington.edu (Neil McKenzie) writes:

> This is really dumb.  It is really mysterious why there is even an
> /etc/termcap file and even a man page to go with it because the
> termcap file is just ignored.

No. There are a number of applications that runs under System V that
still wants termcap, using their own routines to read that file.

> What is even more unfriendly is that
> the source descriptions are compiled into an unreadable format.  This
> makes it very hard to study examples, since the source formats seem
> to be unavailable (or just well hidden), and reading the binary
> is no help.

Try the command 'infocmp' (if Apple includes it in their distribution).
It will decompile terminfo entries for you, in almost any format you
want. ANd it can even generate termcap entries from the terminfo ones.

> I've tried to construct a terminfo file from the termcap file, but
> it doesn't quite work right, but it looks ok.

Try the command 'captoinfo'.
-- 
Robert Claeson, ERBE DATA AB, P.O. Box 77, S-175 22 Jarfalla, Sweden
"No problems." -- Alf
Tel: +46 758-202 50  EUnet:    rclaeson@ERBE.SE  uucp:   uunet!erbe.se!rclaeson
Fax: +46 758-197 20  Internet: rclaeson@ERBE.SE  BITNET: rclaeson@ERBE.SE