Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!tolerant.UUCP!news
From: news@tolerant.UUCP (The Daily Fishwrap)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Submission for comp-unix-microport
Message-ID: <8901090643.AA20907@handel.TOLERANT>
Date: 9 Jan 89 06:43:41 GMT
Sender: uuclerk@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 26

Path: tolerant!voder!apple!bloom-beacon!gatech!ken
From: ken@gatech.edu (Ken Seefried III)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: SVID (was: Submission for comp-unix-microport)
Message-ID: <17801@gatech.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 89 04:31:46 GMT
References: <8901082322.AA19653@handel.TOLERANT>
Reply-To: ken@gatech.UUCP (Ken Seefried iii)
Organization: School of Information and Computer Science, Georgia Tech, Atlanta
Lines: 15

>Reply-To: debra@alice.UUCP ()
>Organization: AT&T, Bell Labs
>
>Thank God no! It is still SCO Xenix, but it has been somewhat extended
>to be able to run 386-Unix binaries. It is supposed to become more SVID
>compliant too I believe.
>

Point of clarification:  please correct me if I am wrong, but my
understanding of SVID is that you are either SVID compliant or you are
not.  Being 'more compliant' is like being 'more pregnant'.

Is this not correct?

   ...ken