Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!tolerant.UUCP!uucp
From: uucp@tolerant.UUCP (UNIX-UNIX Cp)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Submission for comp-unix-microport
Message-ID: <8901090935.AA21352@handel.TOLERANT>
Date: 9 Jan 89 09:35:56 GMT
Sender: uuclerk@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 34

Path: tolerant!voder!apple!rutgers!mailrus!bbn!gatech!mcdchg!ddsw1!karl
From: karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: differences in Xenix and the rest
Summary: SCO is now advertising SVVS complience....
Message-ID: <2660@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Date: 9 Jan 89 02:40:11 GMT
References: <9049@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <8705@alice.UUCP>
Reply-To: karl@ddsw1.UUCP (Karl Denninger)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Macro Computer Solutions, Inc., Mundelein, IL
Lines: 21

In article <8705@alice.UUCP> debra@alice.UUCP () writes:
>In article <9049@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> tim@cit-vax.UUCP (Timothy L. Kay) writes:
>>I am in the market for a Unix for a 386.  ... microport .... xenix ....

>>1.  Now that SVR3.2 is out (with the Xenix merged stuff), is SCO Xenix
>>just another derivation from the same sources?

>Thank God no! It is still SCO Xenix, but it has been somewhat extended
>to be able to run 386-Unix binaries. 

I understand, from the brochure we have here, that SCO Xenix V/386 V2.3.1 
has passed the SVVS..... the older versions (2.2.x) were "almost" there -- I
believe there were two exceptions (one having to do with file locking).

I've got the update on order... should be here in a few days.  It will be
interesting to see if it indeed is fully complient.

---
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, ddsw1!karl)
Data: [+1 312 566-8912], Voice: [+1 312 566-8910]
Macro Computer Solutions, Inc.    	"Quality solutions at a fair price"