Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!netsys!len
From: len@netsys.COM (Len Rose)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: 286 serial port woes
Summary: Is it really this bad?
Keywords: UNIX 286, uucp
Message-ID: <11871@netsys.COM>
Date: 15 Jan 89 04:46:00 GMT
Reply-To: len@netsys.COM (Len Rose)
Followup-To: comp.unix.microport
Distribution: na
Organization: Netsys,Inc.
Lines: 21

I am evaluating V/AT 2.4 on an 8 mhz clone 286 with 1 meg
of ram. Can't reliably sustain a uucp transfer at speeds
greater than 2400 baud. The system is extremely slow ,and
is virtually unusable with a 16 bit compress running in the
background.

I despise Xenix yet it seems that SCO Xenix runs rings around
V/AT on the same hardware. 

My question is: Is V/AT really this bad,and if so, how can they
still be in business? I am sure the hardware isn't the blame since
Xenix performs "acceptably" give the fact that it's just a 286.

Stunned and open to advice.




-- 
len@netsys.com
{ames,att,rutgers}!netsys!len