Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!hc!pprg.unm.edu!unmvax!gatech!bloom-beacon!spdcc!dyer
From: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: 386/SX Chip
Message-ID: <2423@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>
Date: 14 Jan 89 23:12:37 GMT
References: <3114@ihuxv.ATT.COM> <6800062@cpe>
Reply-To: dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer)
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Lines: 11

In article <6800062@cpe> tif@cpe.UUCP writes:
>It does require a different version of SCO XENIX 386.  I suppose
>their are some subtle differences that make the regular version
>non-functional.

Huh?  Where'd you get THAT idea??

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
dyer@arktouros.mit.edu