Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:4553 comp.mail.uucp:2658
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!xanth!nic.MR.NET!shamash!com50!mscunx!hawkmoon!det
From: det@hawkmoon.MN.ORG (Derek E. Terveer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Problem with uucp login with SCO XENIX 2.3.1
Summary: uuto/uupick are just shells
Message-ID: <776@hawkmoon.MN.ORG>
Date: 18 Jan 89 00:36:21 GMT
References: <397@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> <439@acheron.UUCP> <210@tiamat.FSC.COM> <212@tiamat.FSC.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: One of the Eternal Champions - Richfield, MN, 554232523, USA
Lines: 18

In article <212@tiamat.FSC.COM>, jim@tiamat.FSC.COM (Jim O'Connor) writes:
> In article <609@ssbn.WLK.COM>, bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) writes:
> > I suggest that this point is moot because HDB includes a script, "uuto"
>
> That's great, and I agree "uuto" is the better solution, but unfortunately
> not everyone has HDB available.

Yes, but uuto (and its companion uupick) is really a simple shell script that
invokes uucp with a somewhat unique destination path.  One should, with relative
ease, be able to write a much simplified uuto and/or uupick and retain much of
the same functionality.

derek
-- 
Derek Terveer 	    det@hawkmoon.MN.ORG || ..!uunet!rosevax!elric!hawkmoon!det
		    w(612)681-6986   h(612)688-0667

"A proper king is crowned" -- Thomas B. Costain