Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:4571 comp.mail.uucp:2666 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!ucsd!rutgers!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Problem with uucp login with SCO XENIX 2.3.1 Message-ID: <13351@ncoast.UUCP> Date: 21 Jan 89 01:16:08 GMT References: <397@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> <439@acheron.UUCP> <210@tiamat.FSC.COM> <598@tapa.UUCP> <402@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix Distribution: na Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh Lines: 20 As quoted from <402@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> by root@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US (Mark J. Bailey): +--------------- | In article <598@tapa.UUCP>, larry@tapa.UUCP (Larry Pajakowski) writes: | > Uuto is also on the 2.2 286 and 386 versions of pre HDP SCO Xenix. | | Yeah, but I think what Jim is talking about is Altos Xenix for the 286. | The word 'Altos' represents a completely different ball game. Altos has | good equipment, but their PROPRIETARY xenix is *NO* SCO 286. You can't even +--------------- Altos and SCO both get Xenix from Microsoft. My opinion? I can't see how anyone can stand SCO Xenix (well, pre-3.2, at least). (For that matter, I can't see how anyone can stand Intel processors....) ++Brandon -- Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc allbery@ncoast.org (soon) uunet!hal.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery ncoast!allbery@hal.cwru.edu Send comp.sources.misc submissions to comp-sources-misc@ NCoast Public Access UN*X - (216) 781-6201, 300/1200/2400 baud, login: makeuser