Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!cwjcc!gatech!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!jim
From: jim@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Jim Fulton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: fix[4567] vs complete redistributions
Message-ID: <8901101454.AA03406@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Date: 10 Jan 89 14:54:21 GMT
References: <30874@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Lines: 15


Did you use the new fix4?  I just applied the xterm fixes from fix1, fix2, and
the new fix4 to an R3 xterm.  The file main.c has a minor problem with the
XConsortium RCS header which has actually been there since fix1.  The file
xterm.man had a redundant patch because of an RCS rev name glitch.  The patch
about which it complains can be ignored.  If you have additional problems, send
me a log file through personal email. 

I just applied fixes 5-7 to a pure R3 xman and got no rejected files.  Please
send a log of the problems through personal email to kit@athena.mit.edu.


							Jim Fulton
							MIT X Consortium
							jim@expo.lcs.mit.edu