Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!bionet!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!bingvaxu!sunybcs!boulder!ccncsu!ncr-fc!dona From: dona@ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Don Allingham) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: X and Display Postscript Message-ID: <184@ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.COM> Date: 20 Jan 89 15:08:22 GMT Organization: NCR MED Ft. Collins, CO Lines: 32 I am relatively new to the X system. I've done a small amount of programming using Xlib, Xt, and Open Dialogue. Overall, I'm impressed with the system, especially with its portibility. I recently saw a demo of Steve Jobs NeXT machine at a local university. The machine uses DisplayPostscript instead of X. It was *very* impressive. Screen displays were *much* faster than X on my Sun 3/60. Is this typical of DisplayPostscript, or is it just the NeXT machine? How does Sun's NeWS (which I believe also uses DisplayPostscript) match against X? In addition, NeXT provides an interface builder, which allows complex user interfaces to be developed in minutes (I've heard rumors the HP is coming up with something similar for X). The buttons, scrollbars, text windows, etc., where much more complex (and better looking) than anything I've seen under X so far. Why? Is DisplayPostscript better than X? Or has NeXT devoted more effort to the problem? Or does NeXT have an advantage of only worrying about their machine? How does Big Blue fit into the picture? They have licenced NeXT's interface. Will this damage the X standard's acceptance? Sun is supposedly developing a NeWS/X server to allow both systems to co-exist. Is this the best approach? Also the GNU project is supposedly building "Ghostscript" into X. As you can see, I have a lot of questions about graphics standards. I don't know enough yet to make a good decision. Any comments would be appreciated. =============================================================================== Don Allingham NCR Microelctronics Fort Collins CO, 80525 (303) 223-5100 ext. 378