Xref: utzoo news.admin:4515 news.sysadmin:2058 news.config:1080
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!purdue!decwrl!eda!jim
From: jim@eda.com (Jim Budler)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.sysadmin,news.config
Subject: Re: French and UK sites wanted for EUcon.
Message-ID: <459@eda.com>
Date: 21 Jan 89 08:57:16 GMT
References: <96@i2ack.UUCP> <303@dcs.UUCP> <55538@pyramid.pyramid.com> <105@i2ack.UUCP>
Reply-To: jim@eda.com (Jim Budler)
Organization: EDA Systems,Inc. Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 35

In article <105@i2ack.UUCP> venta@i2ack.UUCP (Paolo Ventafridda) writes:
# 
# Previous message from Carl (csg@pyramid) perfectly describes the situation:
# i myself took notice of this, and i am doing my best to "lock" (reject)
# outgoing mail out of uunet and eucon. That is, any mail on EUnet.
# Some user on Sublink still didn't get this limitation..
# 
# At least these messages on EUnet and Usenet described how the whole
# thing works :-)
#                          Paolo

I may be incorrect on how I understand this but:

	1. Eucon nodes can send mail to the world, except for Eunet.
	
	2. Eunet nodes can send mail to the world, except for Eucon.

	3. The world can send mail to either, as long as they don't
	attempt to send it *thru* the other.

In the above, receive/from can be substituted for send/to.

In the above Sublink appears to be synonymous with Eucon.

I feel appalled that in this time of increased connectivity, we now
are creating a situation in which some people on Usenet cannot
communicate with other people on Usenet.

I have no desire to cast blame on anyone, but I feel that this situation
is unacceptable.

jim
-- 
Jim Budler   address = uucp: ...!{decwrl,uunet}!eda!jim
					 domain: jim@eda.com