Xref: utzoo sci.bio:1710 sci.med:8277 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!xanth!nic.MR.NET!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!mailrus!iuvax!silver!chiaravi From: chiaravi@silver.bacs.indiana.edu (Lucius Chiaraviglio) Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.med Subject: Re: Neoteny and Human Genetic Engineering Keywords: slave races Message-ID: <2950@silver.bacs.indiana.edu> Date: 8 Jan 89 22:19:25 GMT References: <17917@dhw68k.cts.com> <189@microsoft.UUCP> <2923@silver.bacs.indiana.edu> <13307@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: chiaravi@silver.UUCP (Lucius Chiaraviglio) Organization: Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology at Indiana University, Bloomington Lines: 29 In article <13307@cup.portal.com> mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson) writes: >Lucius Chiaraviglio says the creation of a slave race -- hmm, need to find >a new term for that; how about "animal friends" -- would be an abomination. >Who is to say my abomination is less than your abomination? How is it worse >to make use of a biological robot than an electromechanical robot? Exactly. Do what you will with nonsentient machines, but if you make a sentient machine, it deserves the same rights as other sentient beings. > Don't we >already have slave ... uh, animal friends in the form of dogs and cats? Animal friends are not slaves. However, far from everyone's pets are animal friends. . . . >Both Gordon Letwin and Lucius remark on the topic of IQ tests. I wasn't trying to put any great stock in them, but rather using the topic to point out that talking about raising IQ's (or actually anything else) by a factor of 10 isn't something that you just throw around -- especially considering that chimpanzees (the subject of that part of the original posting) are probably not THAT far behind us. -- | Lucius Chiaraviglio | ARPA: chiaravi@silver.bacs.indiana.edu BITNET: chiaravi@IUBACS.BITNET (IUBACS hoses From: fields; INCLUDE RET ADDR) ARPA-gatewayed BITNET: chiaravi%IUBACS.BITNET@vm.cc.purdue.edu Alt ARPA-gatewayed BITNET: chiaravi%IUBACS.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu