Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!haven!uflorida!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!cunyvm!barilvm!bimacs!kanov From: kanov@bimacs.BITNET (Mechael Kanovsky) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Creationism as a science... Message-ID: <761@bimacs.BITNET> Date: 17 Jan 89 10:36:49 GMT References: Reply-To: kanov@bimacs.UUCP (Mechael Kanovsky) Organization: Bar-Ilan University, Israel. Lines: 21 In article rg20+@andrew.cmu.edu (Rick Francis Golembiewski) writes: >The problem with Creationism as a science, is that you can't really use it to >make a prediction (which you CAN do with Darwinism, it might not be correct, >but that goes into the definition of a theory). Why can't you make any kind >of predictions with Creationism? Well, mainly because it deals with God, What if we say that first g-d created the universe (creatism) and then he let nature i.e. darwinism take over or in other words he also craeted the rules that govern the universe and upon those rules we could make predictions. -- Mechael Kanovsky : BITNET kanov@bimacs.bitnet Math & CS Dept. : UUCP uunet!mcvax!humus!bimacs!kanov Bar-Ilan University : ARPA kanov%bimacs.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu Ramat-Gan Israel : CSNET kanov%bimacs.bitnet%cunyvm.cuny.edu@csnet-relay ! You can't propel yourself forward ! ! by patting yourself on the back !