Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!udel!udccvax1!anand
From: anand@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Anand Iyengar)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: TI announcement
Message-ID: <2739@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU>
Date: 26 Jan 89 16:34:59 GMT
References: <11462@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Reply-To: anand@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Anand Iyengar)
Organization: The Lab Rats
Lines: 18

In article <2471@garth.UUCP> smryan@garth.UUCP (s m ryan) writes:
>>>I'm no physicist, but there seems to be the possibility of quantum
>
>As it turned out, measuring one photon perturbed the other apparently
>instanteously. Thus the LOSS of information might propagate with arbitrary
	This, of course, is a matter of view-point.  One could just as
easily argue that information (/signal/etc.) was fed to the photon.  


>As it turned out, measuring one photon perturbed the other apparently
>instanteously. Thus the LOSS of information might propagate with arbitrary
>speed.
	I'd imagine that the distances that they were measuring over were
quite small.  Could they even be able to detect SOL delays in propagation
over such distances?


							Anand.