Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tank!uxc!deimos!rutgers!att!ttrdc!levy From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5 Subject: Re: possible bug in HDB uucp? Message-ID: <3165@ttrdc.UUCP> Date: 27 Jan 89 06:32:27 GMT References: <1025@vsi.COM> <116@attibr.UUCP> <1033@vsi.COM> Distribution: comp Organization: AT&T, Skokie, IL Lines: 34 In article <1033@vsi.COM>, friedl@vsi.COM (Stephen J. Friedl) writes: < In article <1025@vsi.COM>, friedl@vsi.COM (Stephen J. Friedl) writes: < > [summary] HDB on a 3B2/400, Sys V Rel 3.1. In the Systems < > file, a password containing a % is expanded as in printf, < > so "%foobar" ---> "0.00000oobar". < In article <116@attibr.UUCP>, vch@attibr.UUCP (Vincent C. Hatem) writes: < > Very strange... the source code uses write(2) to send the string to the < > remote host. < The expansion I'm seeing is in the -x9 *debug* output, and I < guess I didn't check to see if it were going to the other end < that way. < In any case, the remote login worked fine if I went at it with < cu, but no combination of % or %% or \% in the password field would < make it work via uucico. I partially verified this (on the 3B2 running SVR3); as root, I Uutry'd a system which had a "%g" embedded in its password and it was similarly "printf- expanded" in the debug output. However, the remote apparently received the correct password, as the login succeeded and the machines began to converse. I pored over the HDB source on another machine (which has an earlier version of conn.c, i.e., 1.16, versus 2.9 according to "what" on the binary which was supplied with my 3B2) and this phenomenon appears to be impossible! As V. Hatem pointed out, write() is used to send the data to the remote host. This is done one character at a time. Also, the debug output is written one character at a time. fprintf(stderr...) is used, but always a proper format is supplied (through the CDEBUG macro) for the second argument. Doo doo doo doo, Doo doo doo doo, ... -- Daniel R. Levy UNIX(R) mail: att!ttbcad!levy AT&T Bell Laboratories 5555 West Touhy Avenue Any opinions expressed in the message above are Skokie, Illinois 60077 mine, and not necessarily AT&T's.