Xref: utzoo comp.edu:1991 comp.cog-eng:935 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!oliveb!pyramid!prls!philabs!linus!mbunix!sboyle From: sboyle@mbunix.mitre.org (Stephen V. Boyle) Newsgroups: comp.edu,comp.cog-eng Subject: Re: References: Reading from CRT vs. Paper Summary: Oops. Message-ID: <43922@linus.UUCP> Date: 27 Jan 89 16:40:24 GMT References: <12.UUL1.3#913@acw.UUCP> <928@novavax.UUCP> <43835@linus.UUCP> Sender: news@linus.UUCP Reply-To: sboyle@mbunix (Boyle) Organization: The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Mass. Lines: 28 In article <43835@linus.UUCP> sboyle@mbunix.mitre.org (Boyle) writes: > >Gould, J. D., Alfaro, L., Finn, R., Haupt, B., Minuto, A., and Salaun, J. > (1987). Why reading was slower from CRT displays than from paper. > Proceedings of ACM CHI + GI, 1987, 7-11 > >The above is also available separately from ACM: ACM-0-89791-213-6/87/0004/0007 >$0.75/copy. > > Sorry people, the above is *not* available from the ACM. The $0.75/copy refers to the charge to be remitted to the ACM for copying the article. To quote the ACM copying policy: "Copying without fee is permitted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage and credit to the source is given. Abstracting with credit is permitted. For other copying of articles that carry a code ath the bottom of the first page, copying is per- mitted provided that the per-copy fee indicated on the code is paid through the Copyright Clearance Center, 21 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970. For permission to republish write to: Director of Publications, Association for Computing Machinery. To copy otherwise, or republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission." My apologies to anyone whom I've inconvenienced, and to the ACM. Thanks to George Leach at Paradyne, whose query prompted me to research this completely. (Of course, I was *positive* that I had ordered reprints from the ACM in the past. It's a terrible thing to experience the deterioration of what was once a perfectly sub-adequate mind. :=)