Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ucsd!orion.cf.uci.edu!oberon!bbn!mit-eddie!killer!vector!nobody From: john@zygot.UUCP (John Higdon) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: ATT commerical Message-ID: Date: 25 Jan 89 00:00:00 GMT Sender: chip@vector.UUCP Lines: 16 Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-Submissions-To: telecom@bu-cs.bu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 31, message 4 In article <7303@ihlpf.ATT.COM>, jnl@ihlpf.ATT.COM (John N. Le) writes: > Even if AT&T rates are higher in some cases, so what. If you like > to pay less, it's your choice, but I wish you luck if you try to demand > from your LD company the same high quality service that AT&T are doing > for yearssssss. But now it's 1989, and the old stand-by reliable hissy analog connections still provided by AT&T are a little passe. Occasionally, I get a digital transcontinental connection from AT&T, but it's a small percentage of the time and only to major metro areas. Sprint on the other hand, seems to provide fast, reliable digital connections virtually everywhere. I'd use them if their rates were higher, but they're *lower*. -- John Higdon john@zygot ..sun!{apple|cohesive|pacbell}!zygot!john