Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!sanders From: sanders@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Steve Anderson) Newsgroups: comp.graphics Subject: Showscan Keywords: Big Picture, 70MM, 2001 : A Space Odyssey Message-ID: <33335@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: 1 Feb 89 14:41:22 GMT Distribution: na Organization: Ohio State Univ Computer & Info Science Lines: 56 Having just returned from a tour of the Showscan studios in Culver City California, here is my 2 cents: The Showscan process, developed by special effects god Douglas Trumbull (2001:A Space Odyssey, Close Encounters, Blade Runner, Brainstrorm,...) features 60 different frames/second using 70MM film, compared with the ususal 24 different frames (each imaged twice) on 35MM film. The technicians explained that 60 fps was chosen because they felt it was a number which would provide them some degree of 'compatibility' with techniques that do or will exist. (HDTV for example.) They also said that they could do up to 72 fps, but the difference between 60 and 72 was not noticable. Another factor they said contributed to the 60 fps decision was it made the modifications to the camera/projector systems 'easier', with respect to gear drive changes. The Showscan process is actually a complete projection environment, with carefully planned seat placement, a big screen, and awesome sound systems. They even installed a system in France with seats that moved around on hydraulics, capable of some incredible g-forces. I think I remember them saying they had about 20-30 sites installed around the world, and are of course working on a few more. They had a recently announced 10-movie deal signed with a major studio to produce featrue films using Showscan. They are then planning on 'converting' some number of theaters in major markets which will show those films. They have a chicken- egg problem; no one wants to be the first to film using Showscan because there are no theaters to show it, and no theaters want to convert untill there are some movies. The conversion process wasn't really that difficult, they exchange some gears in the projector, and add a "little more hardware" I forget what they said it cost, but I remember thinking it wasn't all that much given the big business of the movies. (and the $5 tickets :-) ) Speaking of the movies, they don't have that many, but I saw two of them and they were pretty awesome. The 3D quality was pretty impressive. I won't address the idiotic issue of viewing movies through stupid plastic glasses. The crispness and clarity of the images were truly breathtaking. Besides the usual gratuitous roller coaster, mountain flying, motorcycle, etc. shots, things like close ups of people were amazing. Many of the scenes seemed so real you'd swear you were there. For anybody that wants to get more information from the real source here is there address: Showscan Film Corporation 3939 Landmark St. Culver City, CA 90232-2315 (213) 558-0150 (213) 559-7984 (FAX) -- H. Stephen Anderson | e-mail: The Ohio Supercomputer Graphics Project | steve@hobbes.cgrg.ohio-state.edu 1224 Kinnear Rd. | phone: Columbus OH 43212 | (614) 292-3416