Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!tektronix!tekcrl!tekchips!danw
From: danw@tekchips.CRL.TEK.COM (Daniel E. Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Yet Another Lint Foul-up
Keywords: Idle curiosity.
Message-ID: <3486@tekcrl.CRL.TEK.COM>
Date: 18 Jan 89 03:12:05 GMT
References: <1298@tank.uchicago.edu> <806@auspex.UUCP> <17985@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Sender: ftp@tekcrl.CRL.TEK.COM
Lines: 10

In article <17985@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>, jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) writes:
> In article <806@auspex.UUCP> guy@auspex.UUCP (Guy Harris) writes:
> >>	I've passively watched the discussion of lint's problems with
> >>  exit(0) from main(), and find myself wondering why it matters.  
>       
>       Any UNIX program that returns a random exit status is broken.
> 
  I agree.  Please find something else about lint to complain about.

Dan Wilson