Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!kddlab!titcca!sragwa!wsgw!socslgw!diamond
From: diamond@csl.sony.JUNET (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: What is B&D? (Re: Bondage and Discipline Languages)
Message-ID: <10011@diamond.csl.sony.JUNET>
Date: 24 Jan 89 00:46:19 GMT
References: <4265@enea.se>
Organization: Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan
Lines: 21

David Gudeman (gudeman@arizona.edu) writes:
> >Why not trust the programmer to modularize and document
> >the code correctly?

In article <4265@enea.se>, sommar@enea.se (Erland Sommarskog) writes:
> If we could trust programmers there would be no need for language
> of any higher level than C.

You mean machine language and front-panel switches.

The reason trustworthy programmers have occasional (:-) use for
languages at higher level than these is that it does save work to
have overloaded operators, polymorphic procedures, etc.  And it
saves work to give rules to the compiler once instead of using the
editor to copy code.  Even trustworthy fingertips sometimes hit
the wrong button.
-- 
Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Lab (diamond%csl.sony.jp@relay.cs.net)
  The above opinions are my own.   |  Why are programmers criticized for
  If they're also your opinions,   |  re-inventing the wheel, when car
  you're infringing my copyright.  |  manufacturers are praised for it?