Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!kmont
From: kmont@hpindda.HP.COM (Kevin Montgomery)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: ISO RPC DP
Message-ID: <5560013@hpindda.HP.COM>
Date: 25 Jan 89 01:00:24 GMT
References: <733@pyuxe.UUCP>
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 12

/ hpindda:comp.protocols.iso / ald1@pyuxe.UUCP (Alan L Dickman) /  8:25 am  Jan 20, 1989 /
> Can anyone tell me the status of of ISO DP 10154 (?)
> which is the draft proposal for a Remote Procedure
> Call mechanism.  Was it adopted?

If you're talking about the fasttrack ECMA -> ISO proposal,
I'd guess (note disclaimer), that the US voted no and Britain
voted yes (probably with comments).  How's that for an insightful 
piece of information?  (I'd guess that means that overall the
vote probably floundered along the 'no' lines)...

					kevin (speculating for himself only)