Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: __STDC__ and non-conforming ANSI C compilers
Message-ID: <5414@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jan 89 16:26:32 GMT
References: <9391@smoke.BRL.MIL> <8731@megaron.arizona.edu> <9405@smoke.BRL.MIL> <344@twwells.uucp>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 9

In article <344@twwells.uucp> bill@twwells.UUCP (T. William Wells) writes:
>...by defining a meaning for __STDC__ == 0,
>we have a standard by which we can judge the use of __STDC__...

An excellent idea.  Self-respecting compiler writers would not casually
define __STDC__ == 0 if the ANSI standard gave a specific meaning to
it.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi