Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: IIgs past & future
Message-ID: <9561@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 1 Feb 89 22:55:50 GMT
References: <8552@claris.com>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <8552@claris.com> scott@claris.com (Scott Lindsey) writes:
>I think Apple some people at Apple are definitely committed to the
>IIgs, but it *is* a painful machine to program for.

Just like the Macintosh!

By the way the Mac SE/30 is really neat but it needs more memory
(just as the base IIGS does).  If it had reasonable Apple II emulation
I would probably buy one and give up on the 65*-based machines.