Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!sun.soe.clarkson.edu!jk0
From: jk0@sun.soe!clutx.clarkson.edu (Jason Coughlin,221 Rey,,)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TC2.0 bugfree ?
Message-ID: <2041@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Date: 22 Jan 89 21:34:28 GMT
References: <537@cs-spool.calgary.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.soe.clarkson.edu
Reply-To: jk0@sun.soe!clutx.clarkson.edu.UUCP
Lines: 26

From article <537@cs-spool.calgary.UUCP>, by andrews@calgary.UUCP (Keith Andrews):

> Nevertheless, Turbo C likes to make noises about practically everything else,
> I wonder they don't issue warnings about this?
>

   I compiled something like this with Turbo C and 4.2 BSD cc:

  int hello(c)
  char c;
  {
     switch (c) {
        case 'a': ....
            return (b*a);
        case 'b': ....
            return (b*c);
     }
  }

	This is JUST an example, but TC didn't give me ANY warnings, but
   4.2 BSD figured out that my simple return at the end of the function
   was inconsistent.  >I wonder why they don't issue warnings like this?

--
Jason Coughlin
(jk0@clutx, jk0@clutx.clarkson.edu)