Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!mirror!rayssd!srhqla!csun!csuna!abcscnge
From: abcscnge@csuna.UUCP (Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TC2.0 bugfree ?
Message-ID: <1598@csuna.UUCP>
Date: 22 Jan 89 18:48:16 GMT
References: <3785@druwy.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: abcscnge@csuna.UUCP (Scott "The Pseudo Hacker" Neugroschl)
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Lines: 19

In article <3785@druwy.ATT.COM> rhm@druwy.UUCP (MasseyR) writes:
[ statement in about TC2.0 being bug free, context of a subroutine ]
>	i = (*cp++ << 8) + *cp++;


I can't find it in my copy of K&R, but I think that they (and most
C compilers I have seen) indicate that ++'ing the same variable multiple
times in a single expression is undefined.  Hence, this statement cannot
really be used as an example of a TC bug.

NO FLAMES PLEASE!!!  I would like any ANSI X3J11'ers or TC hacks or anyone
who can find documentation one way or the other to respond in a reasonable
manner.

-- 
Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl
UUCP:  ...!sm.unisys.com!csun!csuna!abcscnge
-- "Beat me, whip me, make me code in Ada"
-- Disclaimers?  We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!