Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!sharkey!atanasoff!deimos!eecea!terry
From: terry@eecea.eece.ksu.edu (Terry Hull)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Inboard 386/AT (was Re: Intel Inboard 386/PC)
Message-ID: <542@eecea.eece.ksu.edu>
Date: 25 Jan 89 14:59:46 GMT
References: <7244@xanth.cs.odu.edu> <5714@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <1478@neoucom.UUCP> <32480@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: terry@eecea.eece.ksu.edu (Terry Hull)
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Organization: Kansas State University, Manhattan
Lines: 17

In article <1478@neoucom.UUCP> wtm@neoucom.UUCP (Bill Mayhew) writes:
>I strongly recommend that you not bother with the AT version of the
>Inboard unless you have the one of the approved three PCs or else
>can buy it with the understanding you may want to return the board.

I bought an Inboard386/AT about a year ago.  At that time the Intel
hot line had quite a list of machines that it would work with.  I put
mine in a PC Limited 286/8 and have had excellent results, although the
machine was not on the "official" list of supported machines.  My only
complaint is the board will only accept 3 MB of 32 bit memory.  


-- 
Terry Hull                    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
                                           Kansas State University
INTERNET: terry@eecea.eece.ksu.edu          Manhattan, KS  66502 
UUCP: rutgers!ksuvax1!eecea!terry