Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!amdahl!pacbell!sactoh0!bkbarret
From: bkbarret@sactoh0.UUCP (Brent K. Barrett)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TC 2.0 Pros/Cons
Message-ID: <654@sactoh0.UUCP>
Date: 26 Jan 89 06:50:17 GMT
References: <31304@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <8000033@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <9089@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Organization: Sacramento Public Access, Ca. USA
Lines: 11

In article <9089@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>, jsilva@cogsci.berkeley.edu (John Silva) writes:
> Perhaps bit fields would be byte expanded if the compilation switch pertaining
> to byte/word alignment were set to byte alignment.

 That's obvious, but wasn't the point of my message. They should
have TOLD us the default had changed, and they didn't.

-- 
 "Somebody help me! I'm trapped in this computer!"
  
 Brent Barrett ..pacbell!sactoh0!bkbarret GEMAIL: B.K.BARRETT