Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!ncar!tank!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxg.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!leonardr
From: leonardr@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: FAX
Message-ID: <46100262@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 23 Jan 89 21:34:00 GMT
References: <67578EXZ@PSUVM>
Lines: 28
Nf-ID: #R:<67578EXZ@PSUVM>:-16:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:46100262:000:1448
Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!leonardr    Jan 23 15:34:00 1989



I recently wrote:

>	Assuming that you mean FAX Modems  as opposed to FAX Machines, then I 
>think I can give you some informatioin that might be helpful.
>	First of all, to my knowledge all of the current FAX modems for the Mac
>are both Group 2 and Group 3 compatible (there is no group 4!) with some
>minor exceptions (a FAX Machine here and there which didn't follow the rules.)

	I would like to apologize by correcting myself.  What I should have said
is that there is a proposal/development of a group 4 specification for FAX
transmission which will better support high resolutioin graphics (among other
things) and that there are no Group 4 FAX Modems (nor Fax machines for that
matter).
	I am sorry for the error...


+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+                                 +  Any thing I say may be taken as  +
+   Leonard Rosenthol             +  fact, then again you might decide+
+   President, LazerWare, inc.    +  that it really isn't, so you     +
+                                 +  never know, do you??             +
+   leonardr@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu     +                                   +
+   GEnie:  MACgician             +  MacNET: MACgician                +
+   Delphi: MACgician             +  AppleLink: D0025                 +
+                                 +                                   +
+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+