Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!xxiaoye From: xxiaoye@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Xiaoxia Ye) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Chinese word processing Message-ID: <11998@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Date: 28 Jan 89 17:06:22 GMT References: <8901271611.AA06203@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU Reply-To: xxiaoye@eleazar.dartmouth.edu Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Lines: 55 In article <8901271611.AA06203@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> ELFJ@VAX5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU writes: >Does anyone know anything about word processing on the Mac? Has anyone >used FeiMa and have any comments, good or bad? > >Any help will be much appreciated. > >Linda Iroff >Humanities Computing >Cornell University >elfj@crnlvax5.bitnet >elfj@vax5.cit.cornell.edu First of all, FeiMa is not for macintosh, it's for IBM. I only wish that they have a Mac version. It's a great program, the printout is superb on a regular Epson dot-matrix printer. It looks even better on a laster printer. Input of characters is painless. It guesses the WORD, not character that you input, and about 90% of the time, its guess is right. One caveat: if you use it to write ancient chinese (which very uses diffrent WORDING from modern chinese,the so called Bai2Hua4Wen2 (Plain-Talking-Lanuage)), its guesses are horrible. But for most of modern chinese writing, it's excellent. There are 2 chinese word precessors that I have seen people use at the Asian Studies Department here at Dartmouth. The first one is ChineseTalk (ZhongWen Talk). Actually, ChineseTalk is not an application, it's a system all by it self, in which you can switch between the Chinese and English writing mode. MacWrite is the only word processor that can properly run under this sysem. ChineseTalk has a BeiJing verion and TaiPei version, ( with simplified and unsimplified character sets, respectively) I forgot the company's address. If you need to know, I can ask the people in Humanities computing here. Another program is called MacChinese. I haven't seen it, but from what I have heard from a friend it is very UNMACISH, and very unwieldy to use, such as that you would have to remember the EXACT pinyin of each character plus you would have to know the exact order of a particular character in its dictionary character set. If you input the wrong order number, you get the wrong characer, you would have to try again and again, until you get it right. One advantage of MacChinese is that it has a POSTSCRIPT font. There is a DA called "Mishu" (meaning secretary in chinese"). It runs under the standard Mac Operating System, and works with programs like MacWrite, MacPaint, and even PageMaker! It's very nice, except that it's not as powerful as the other two Chinese word processors. Its dictionary is not large enough, and DON'T EVER TRY TO PRINT ON A LASER WRITER!!! It would take 50 minutes or so to create the bitmaps of all the 11 fonts that it use to construct the characters, and probably the printer is going to flush the job with some kind of "offending command" complaint. Mishu has a new version now. I haven't seen it, but I would expect it to be better. "VOX CLAMANTIS IN DESERTO" -- ahh, who else do I speak for! __________________________________________________________________________ Xiaoxia Ye Internet/Bitnet xxiaoye@eleazar.dartmouth.edu Dartmouth College /UUCP: Xiaoxia.Ye@dartmouth.edu