Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!s.cc.purdue.edu!ags
From: ags@s.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: LS PAscal gripe
Message-ID: <3746@s.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 27 Jan 89 18:56:36 GMT
References: <410fcecb.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu>
Reply-To: ags@s.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 11

In article <410fcecb.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu> billkatt@sol.engin.umich.edu (Steve Bollinger) writes:
>Has anybody else noticed that Lightspeed Pascal (2.0) does not support negative
>field widths in write/writeln statements to left justify numerical output?

What's wrong with using a field width of 1?  This also left-justifies
numerical output, and it has the additional advantage of being correct
Pascal.

-- 
Dave Seaman	  					
ags@j.cc.purdue.edu