Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:4183 comp.sys.mac:25852
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!gatech!hubcap!mikeoro
From: mikeoro@hubcap.UUCP (Michael K O'Rourke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: MacSE SIMMS
Keywords: SIMMS
Message-ID: <4255@hubcap.UUCP>
Date: 30 Jan 89 21:17:41 GMT
References: <4195@hubcap.UUCP> <81041@felix.UUCP>
Organization: Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Lines: 24

> In article <4195@hubcap.UUCP> mikeoro@hubcap.UUCP (Michael K O'Rourke) writes:
> <I read here a week or so ago that someone thought that the 256K SIMMS from
> <the MacSE were 120ns, Mac II compatible.  Does anyone know if this is really
> <true?  Is there a way to tell from looking at the numbers on the chips?
> 
> I posted the original article by quoting Chris Espinosa who writes The Help
> Folder in MacUser. However, several people replied both here and in the
> mail that this simply isn't true. If there are any numbers on the chips,
> why don't you post them and we'll see if there is a 12 or 15 on them
> someplace.

Well, they aren't mac II compatible. It turned out they had 15's on them. In
other words, they are 150ns simms. So I guess they aren't work much.

Michael O'Rourke 








Disclaimer: don't sue me or i'll kill you.