Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:11253 comp.unix.aux:617 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!bionet!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!mailrus!ncar!umigw!umbio!ibiza!aem From: aem@ibiza.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.aux Subject: Re: terminfo vs. termcap Keywords: Why do we need two different terminal capability widgets? Message-ID: <1312@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> Date: 23 Jan 89 21:40:06 GMT References: <6966@june.cs.washington.edu> <358@tcsc3b2.UUCP> Sender: netnews@umbio.MIAMI.EDU Reply-To: aem@Mthvax.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg) Organization: University of Miami Hertz Lab, Coral Gables, FL Lines: 19 In <358@tcsc3b2.UUCP>, wrote: >The older /etc/termcap file was used in earlier days of UNIX for the >definition of terminal characteristics, but has been replaced with the >terminfo database because the latter is quicker and more efficient to >process by curses(3X) than the /etc/termcap file. The only reason that >the /etc/termcap is still around is to retain compatibility with older >software that still uses the /etc/termcap file for the definition of >terminal capabilities. Someday, AT&T will probably go through with their >threat of removing the /etc/termcap file from future releases of UNIX V. /etc/termcap is BSD. AT&T came up with a compiled version which loads somewhat faster, and uses very similar source files. Most, if not all, BSD systems use /etc/termcap. Terminfo is used by Sys V and derivatives (A/IX, A/UX, etc). aem a.e.mossberg aem@mthvax.miami.edu MIAVAX::AEM (Span) aem@umiami.BITNET (soon) Men are born to be slaves. - Lillie Langtry