Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!bionet!ames!mike
From: mike@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Mike Smithwick)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re:  Structured Programming
Message-ID: <21334@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: 2 Feb 89 16:35:15 GMT
References: <18291@adm.BRL.MIL>
Organization: NASA - Ames Research Center
Lines: 26

In article <18291@adm.BRL.MIL> mchinni@ardec.arpa (Michael J. Chinni, SMCAR-CCS-E) writes:
>
>> > What REALLY happens when a group of structured programmers tries to
>> > develop a large program? 
[delete. . .]
>if the code had been "structured" it would have taken us no more that 2
>man-weeks.
>

This reminds me of a joke I just made up :

Q: How many structured programmers does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: 10 - 1 to screw in the light bulb, but 9 to make sure he does it right
   the first time.


Sorry.



-- 
          *** mike (cerbral GURU, insert M&Ms to restart) smithwick***
"The great thing about standards is that there are so many of them!"

[disclaimer : nope, I don't work for NASA, I take full blame for my ideas]