Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ateng!chip
From: chip@ateng.ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Xenix mail system
Message-ID: <1989Jan23.214853.13271@ateng.ateng.com>
Date: 24 Jan 89 02:48:52 GMT
References: <417@ispi.UUCP> <6800070@cpe>
Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL
Lines: 19

According to tif@cpe.UUCP:
>According to chip@ateng.ateng.com:
>>According to tif@cpe.UUCP:
>>>because it works and most people are too set in their ways to try it.
>>
>>As soon as I discovered that, I switched to UUCP.  If MICNET is careless in
>>copying files, what else is carelessly written?  Best not to find out the
>>hard way.
>
>I rest my case.

Now, wait a minute.  I *tried* Micnet.  I had a working Micnet network with
three hosts.  I then switched to UUCP because of Micnet's inferiority to
UUCP in several key areas.  I wasn't "set in my ways"; I simply evaluated
Micnet and found it wanting.
-- 
Chip Salzenberg             <chip@ateng.com> or <uunet!ateng!chip>
A T Engineering             Me?  Speak for my company?  Surely you jest!
	  "It's no good.  They're tapping the lines."