Xref: utzoo ont.events:1041 ont.general:659 can.general:1116 can.politics:2129 Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!mathieu From: mathieu@ists.ists.ca (Pierre Mathieu) Newsgroups: ont.events,ont.general,can.general,can.politics Subject: Re: Leonard Peltier P.O.W. Summary: To post or not to post... Message-ID: <351@ists.ists.ca> Date: 25 Jan 89 15:40:38 GMT Article-I.D.: ists.351 References: <568@yunccn.UUCP> <1840@sparkles.dcss.mcmaster.ca> Sender: news@ists.ists.ca Lines: 34 In article <1840@sparkles.dcss.mcmaster.ca>, dan@sparkles.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Dan Trottier) writes: > In article <568@yunccn.UUCP> john@yunccn.UUCP (John Hummel) writes: > >Keywords: Justice Sovereignty Native People > > Regardless of good intentions the Usenet is not a place where on should > be canvasing for donations. > > (I'm sorry for posting this but every once in a while it seems people > need to be reminded that canvasing for personal causes is not a > proper use of the net.) > > Perhaps from your received funds you can pay us for the disk space and > phone cost used for your article. > Although I will admit that this article should probably not have been crossposted so heavily and perhaps should have been shorter, I do not agree that the net is not the place for such items. I for one was very interested in learning about this man and I don't believe that I would have ever known about this if not for this posting. I find this sort of thing far more useful than a discussion on how many inconspicuous numbers one can find on our paper currency for instance. :-) It was perhaps not very wise to ask for contributions on the net but I think that deleting the article for this reason is a rather draconian measure. After all, if this rule of thumb starts applying, should not "FOR SALE" and "FOR RENT" articles also be banned from the net? Are these not also personal causes? Or should people start paying for posting? (***shiver*** :-)) Regards, Pierre Mathieu mathieu@ists.yorku.ca Center for Research in Exp. Space Science "Avast, swabs!"