Xref: utzoo sci.research:584 talk.politics.misc:21083 sci.bio:1786
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!ncar!gatech!rutgers!njin!princeton!phoenix!amlovell
From: amlovell@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Anthony M Lovell)
Newsgroups: sci.research,talk.politics.misc,sci.bio
Subject: Re: animal research
Keywords: none
Message-ID: <5966@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 31 Jan 89 01:03:11 GMT
References: <221@anselm.UUCP> <5963@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 20

In article <5963@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>, skellyjp@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (James P Skelly) writes:
> The following is taken from the pamphlet "What if - There were no animal
> research?" put out by the Foundation For Biomedical Research.
 
[examples of ruinous mayhem deleted ]

  If we let those animals off the hook on this one, what will they ask
for next?  And next the plants will get all these ideas about how
they're equal.  I caught an animal rights activist trying to get my dog
to sign a petition the other day.  And my rabbits Starsky and Hutch just
happen to think they look GOOD in Maybelline mascara.  They might want
to pursue a career modelling cosmetics products and I'm gonna have to
tell them they CAN'T because some pansy animal lobby says it's
IMMORAL?!?

-- 
amlovell@phoenix.princeton.edu     ...since 1963.
"But who am *I* going to kill?" .. 7 year-old Paul deMarcellus, upon
being told that there are no more Indians raiding Western forts.
Bless his conservative heart.