Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:4816 rec.ham-radio:8126 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!encore!cloud9!jjmhome!cpoint!die From: die@cpoint.UUCP (David I. Emery) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio Subject: Building a simple home circuit to read data off remote crt screen Keywords: tempest, emc, rfi, correllator, pll Message-ID: <2010@cpoint.UUCP> Date: 23 Jan 89 04:54:47 GMT Reply-To: die@cpoint.UUCP (David I. Emery) Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp., Hopkinton Mass. Lines: 45 A year or so ago I saw a demo on TV (on ABC's Nightline I think) of what was refered to as a simple device that could be built with $25 worth of parts that could recover an image of the text on a CRT display belonging a nearby PC or terminal from its spurious electromagnetic radiation. The demo, done in London to circumvent strong US government opposition to demoing this technology on commercial TV, showed a somewhat noisy but quite readable image of text on the screen of a PC about 25 feet away from the loop antenna used to pick the signal up. Does anyone know what the $25 circuit consists of ? Can it really be built for $25 ? Some thoughts It is quite clear that the video circuitry in a monitor radiates broadband pulses with a spectral peaks at the ringing frequencies of the video circuitry (eg. the wires to the tube ring like a spark transmitter when excited by the hf energy contained in the bright/dark and dark/bright transistions). And it is also clear that a monitor radiates lots of energy at harmonics of its sweep frequency (try using a VLF receiver near a TV). To me the obvious thing to do is to recover phase lock to the horizontal sweep by locking on to some harmonic, and divide that reference down to generate frame/field timing. The data might be recovered by generating a sample pulse delayed by a variable digital time delay circuit from the phase locked timing reference and using that pulse to sample the output of an envelope detector following a very broadband hf to vhf amplifier driven by the pickup loop antenna. By averaging thousands of these pixel wide samples and then slowly sweeping the time delay by one pixel at a time one could very slowly reconstruct the image. Naturally this could be done much faster (but not for $25) by using a modified frame grabber as the correlator. Another technique involves video frequency analog ccd shift registers in a correlator. Is there a better way of doing this I am missing ? -- David I. Emery Clearpoint Research Corp. 99 South Street, Hopkinton Ma. 01748 1-508-435-2000 {decvax, cybvax0, mirror}!frog!cpoint!die