Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!pacbell!well!tneff From: tneff@well.UUCP (Tom Neff) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Dan Quayle on the Space Race Message-ID: <10460@well.UUCP> Date: 24 Jan 89 15:11:11 GMT References: <45000017@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <45000018@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: tneff@well.UUCP (Tom Neff) Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA Lines: 31 Andrew Higgins shifts his ground with all the admirable agility you'd hope for in someone with the unenviable job of defending Dan Quayle before this newsgroup. :-) At first we were supposed to believe that Dan wasn't really that dumb or uninformed after all, on the strength of a defense policy article dealing with space issues. Then a bunch of responses come in pointing out that these things are ghost-written by aides to serve the boss's constituency interests and political agenda, and don't tell a thing about Quayle's ignorance or lack thereof. Oh, well, ok, <*SHIFT*> what really matters, we're now told, is that Quayle is *responsible* for those articles appearing. Yeah, and if he doesn't do what we want (who's this we, white man? Aha, there's an NSS in the signature) we can REMIND HIM OF THE ARTICLE! Wow, *that* ought to have heads rolling in the EOB, don't you think? :-) In reality any politician who can't sidestep some policy article his aides ghosted last term isn't electable material to begin with; and dumb as Danno is, we do know he's electable. It takes more than a soft spot for hiring Trekkies as summer interns to be a leader in the space program: you have to have the personal (slightly irrational) vision that will keep your eyes riveted on the goal when other stuff intrudes; and you need the respect of the White House. Dan has been given this job as a sinecure, and no matter how many articles his gophers put out and no matter how many speeches he gives on the swiss steak circuit, the White House will still thank him very nicely for his work and put it on the agenda... SOMEWHERE, after the Seychelles but before the potato treaties. This is the sense I get at the moment. Dan can surprise us by exerting tons of personal initiative. My only point is that nothing we've seen so far hints at this. -- Tom Neff tneff@well.UUCP or tneff@dasys1.UUCP