Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!haven!aplcen!aplcomm!stdc.jhuapl.edu!jwm
From: jwm@stdc.jhuapl.edu (Jim Meritt)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Fun with the semantics of paradox
Keywords: Paradoxes, Undecidability
Message-ID: <3145@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu>
Date: 3 Feb 89 17:42:48 GMT
References: <1883@buengc.BU.EDU> <2996@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> <905@ubu.warwick.UUCP> <479@aipna.ed.ac.uk> <1036@hudson.acc.virginia.edu> <3715@uklirb.UUCP> <44071@linus.UUCP>
Sender: news@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu
Reply-To: jwm@aplvax.UUCP (Jim Meritt)
Organization: JHU-Applied Physics Laboratory
Lines: 10


This sentence is false.


(IMHO, a paradox is a function of the language it is expressed in, and
not of the universe.  YOU may not understand it, but so what?)


Disclaimer:  "It's mine!  All mine!!!"   
					- D. Duck