Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!buengc!bph
From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Rolle's Theorem.
Message-ID: <2095@buengc.BU.EDU>
Date: 10 Feb 89 16:21:49 GMT
References: <1706@tank.uchicago.edu> <9526@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <kXuo9-y00V4=88uEVm@andrew.cmu.edu> <2053@buengc.BU.EDU> <0XvA3xy00Xoj82iV53@andrew.cmu.edu> <2073@buengc.BU.EDU> <9551@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <849@csd4.milw.wisc.edu>
Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton)
Followup-To: comp.ai
Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng.
Lines: 16

In article <849@csd4.milw.wisc.edu> markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>In article <9551@ihlpb.ATT.COM> arm@ihlpb.UUCP (55528-Macalalad,A.R.) writes:
>>In article <2073@buengc.BU.EDU> bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>>>
>>> [..something blithering about calculus...]

I just Looove being shown to be dead wrong.

It makes my lower cervical vertibrae squeeze together with sheer anxious
tension, and those little twitches come back to the corner of my eyes...

'scuse me whilst I go soak my head...

				--Blair
				  "Yeah, but it was a _good_ calc
				   book that refused to prove Rolle's..."