Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!eos!ames!lamaster From: lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: quest for breakthroughs (long) Keywords: architecture, breakthrough, technology Message-ID: <21786@ames.arc.nasa.gov> Date: 13 Feb 89 23:34:36 GMT References: <740@tetons.UUCP> Organization: NASA - Ames Research Center Lines: 61 In article <740@tetons.UUCP> bb@tetons.UUCP (Bob Blau) writes: > Imagine that you are the enlightened head of Imaginary Computer Corp's I need a cheaper/smaller multiport memory interface technology. > What are your assumptions? >End Product: Workstation, Mini >Architecture:RISC, CISC, Vector > multiprocessor, ... All of the above: A fixed instruction format 64 bit supermicro for workstations with multiple processors. >Application: Engineering, Scientific >Timeframe: Next year > What problems are you trying to solve? >- Performance, Cost, Complexity, Size, Reliability, ... Yes. >- Fiberoptic advances creating 1 Gigabyte/sec cable or bus bandwidths > Chip pinout: 250 pins -> 400 -> 800 -> 1000 -> 2000 -> ? > Cable bandwidth: 100 Mbits/sec -> 500M -> 1G -> 10G -> 100G -> ? I want to build a supermicro that is architecturally similar to a big vector/parallel machine - so, in order to do that, I need a technology that will lower the complexity/cost/size of a multi-port memory interface to around $1K. For example, suppose you had a bus-like box with 8 processor ports and 8 Memory Bank ports. You could plug 4 CPU's in, with 2 IO Controllers, a Video Controller, and a spare, and each processor be able to get full memory bandwidth barring bank conflicts. Clock cycle time: should support clock cycle times of 20 ns. Bus width: 64 data bits + 14 bits ECC minimum. Up to 512 data bits wide could potentially be useful on a more expensive model (I am not sure how you would do the bus connections, but the bandwidth is useful.) Total memory bandwidth: 3-25GBytes/sec total, depending on width (64-512 bits) (I know this sounds expensive - that is why a breakthrough is needed.) In other words, something like a Cray Y-MP multiport memory interface, slowed down a little bit and packaged very inexpensively and compactly, is what is desired. -- Hugh LaMaster, m/s 233-9, UUCP ames!lamaster NASA Ames Research Center ARPA lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov Moffett Field, CA 94035 Phone: (415)694-6117