Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!killer!vector!nobody
From: ilya@polya.stanford.edu (Ilya Goldberg)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal
Message-ID: <telecom-v09i0053m07@vector.UUCP>
Date: 8 Feb 89 23:57:44 GMT
Sender: chip@vector.UUCP
Lines: 19
Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp
X-Submissions-To: telecom@bu-cs.bu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 53, message 7

In article <telecom-v09i0042m05@vector.UUCP> MYERSTON@KL.SRI.COM (HECTOR MYERSTON) writes:
>X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp
>X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 42, message 5

>	(1) Many people want to use AT&T Calling Cards from various
>            places but cannot

>	It does not take an MBA to figure out that it would be the
>advantage of both frustrated users and AT&T if a universal,
>non-blockable means of dialing an AT&T operator existed.

I can see it now: "AT & T USA Direct service, now available IN the
United States."

Oh yes, and prepended by the obligatory "For YOUR convinience..."

Ilya Goldberg

ilya@polya.stanford.edu