Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!grace.cs.washington.edu!jeffb From: jeffb@grace.cs.washington.edu (Jeff Bowden) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: typdef int *(il[8][8]); Message-ID: Date: 10 Feb 89 22:29:23 GMT Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu Distribution: comp Organization: Ministry of Silly Walks Lines: 3 The subject says it all. Cfront 1.1 rejects it as being a syntax error. Gcc g++ and pcc all think it's just peachy. Any suggestions on how to make CC happy (i.e. alternative declarations that mean the same thing)?