Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!cbnews!lvc
From: lvc@cbnews.ATT.COM (Lawrence V. Cipriani)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: gcc vs. commercial C compiler (Sun's)
Message-ID: <3621@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 30 Jan 89 18:13:16 GMT
References: <286@proton.UUCP>
Reply-To: lvc@cbnews.ATT.COM (Lawrence V. Cipriani)
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 8

+In article <286@proton.UUCP>, nusbaum@meson.uucp (R. James Nusbaum) writes:
+ Does anyone have any thoughts on the use of gcc (a relatively new
+ compiler as compilers go) vs. using Sun's C compiler in a medical
+ software project where software failure could cause loss of life?

Please tell us what hospitals buy your product so we may stay away from them.
-- 
Larry Cipriani, att!cbnews!lvc or lvc@cbnews.att.com