Xref: utzoo comp.lang.modula2:1242 comp.lang.c:15893
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!ncar!ames!amdcad!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!htsa!fransvo
From: fransvo@htsa.uucp (Frans van Otten)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "for" loops (was Re: C++ vs. Modula2)
Message-ID: <728@htsa.uucp>
Date: 30 Jan 89 12:04:01 GMT
References: <INFO-M2%89011219330825@UCF1VM> <739@jupiter.iis.UUCP> <1611@csuna.UUCP> <1626@csuna.UUCP> <6224@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: fransvo@htsa.UUCP (Frans van Otten)
Followup-To: comp.lang.modula2
Organization: AHA-TMF (Technical Institute), Amsterdam Netherlands
Lines: 16

In article <6224@paris.ics.uci.edu> Doug Schmidt <schmidt@blanche.ics.uci.edu> writes:
>I don't think you've gone far enough.  After all, can't both a while
>loop and a for loop be replaced by an if statement and a goto?
>[..]
>In fact, aren't all high-level control constructs superfluous?
>
>Doug

And I propose to change the name of this newsgroup. It should
be comp.lang.not_modula2_but_c !

-- 
                         Frans van Otten
                         Algemene Hogeschool Amsterdam
			 Technische en Maritieme Faculteit
                         fransvo@htsa.uucp